An Introduction to 9/11 Truth.

Found this on YouTube today. It’s a good video stepping relatively lightly through the truth about 9/11 for those still not awake to that truth yet.
Worth watching and sharing!

Categories: Chaos, f@*ked-up s#!t | Tags: , , , , | 10 Comments

Post navigation

10 thoughts on “An Introduction to 9/11 Truth.

  1. thetruthisstrangerthanfiction

    Reblogged this on thetruthisstrangerthanfiction and commented:
    I think what frustrates me more than almost anything is when I hear people say things like “I don’t really care about what really happened on 9/11″… It’s a copout, really. Take a look! Review what really happened. It is absolutely mind-blowing how much evidence there is publicly available which completely contradicts the official story. Building 7 proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the entire alleged “plot” by Al Qaeda is a complete and utter farce…

  2. I actually watched the whole video to see what it was about! It’s very compelling. I’m skeptical about some of the details presented (that feel like a bit of stretch) but there are so many obvious cover-ups about 9/11 mentioned here that are so alarming. I knew from the beginning that the 9/11 commission obviously kept information secret, but I always thought it was to cover up for gross incompetence or that there must be information that would cause social chaos and panic if the word got out. What I found really interesting is all those “but, what about______?” that I had asked myself at the time surrounding the events. The biggest one being how did planes crashing into the buildings cause the whole building to collapse and not just break off at the site of impact? I was never satisfied with the answers given. Or, why does it look like a demolition? My gut instinct was that there must have been powerful explosions at the base of the towers (not that I’m an expert in these things…) Things that didn’t add up. I was sure then, and now, that building 7 was intentionally demolished for security reasons and was no accident. But I poo-pooed and dismissed the other stuff because everything was explained away. It was all too confusing and didn’t add up, so I just stopped questioning. But now I’m curious again. My husband has a degree in mechanical engineering and I’m going to show him this and see what he thinks. I guess I just never really dug deeper.

    • I commend you for questioning the way you did — soon enough you’ll be in the category of ‘conspiracy theorist’ like me.
      And thanks for stopping by!
      Keep questioning and searching for truth! 🙂

    • thetruthisstrangerthanfiction

      hey, I was gonna add (just remembered today), that if your husband is really interested in looking into all of this, and coming from an engineering background, I wanted to suggest the site/organization “Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth”,

      They literally have compiled more hours of expert, professional analysis of the whole matter than probably anywhere else on the web, going through practically every minute detail of everything from the collapses of all four structures (WTC 1,2,7 and Pentagon) and also the NYST reports, and all the fallacies and fabrications therein. For someone with an engineering mind, it is a veritable goldmine on the subject.

      • Ooh thanks! I will pass it on.

      • thetruthisstrangerthanfiction

        Cool. Yeah, when I started coming across people like Richard Gage (the founder of ae911truth), that was when it started getting pretty “real”, ya know, because I was starting to realize that it wasn’t just a bunch of weirdo “conspiracy theorists” living in their mom’s basement who were asking these kinds of questions, but tons of professional, educated, working-in-the-real-world kinds of folks who actually know exactly what they’re talking about! (my Dad happens to be an engineer too, and when I was learning about building 7 etc., I kept remembering stuff like being a kid and hearing him explain to us about “impact attenuators” and things like that. Very technical, but it really does apply, because it’s the very simple physical principle that tells us that a solid mass cannot pass through another object as if it wasn’t there, there will be interference. i.e., you WILL slow down if your car slams into a row of water-filled barrels going 70 on the freeway. Just like a building WILL slow down if the top part was to fall into the bottom part, unless…. the bottom part is being simultaneously obliterated, essentially just like kicking out all the legs of a table at precisely the same time….) K. Enough rambling!

  3. Before you can charge someone with a crime, you have to know what crime was committed. Should a death be ruled a homicide by gunshot, there better be a bullet hole in the body…

    The order of crime solving, that one must first identify:

    1) WHAT happened before determining
    2) HOW “it” happened…before one can determine
    3) WHO did “it” or
    4) WHY they did “it.”

    Since writing her book, Dr. Wood has come to understand more clearly how cover-ups work. People are encouraged to skip step #1 and begin arguing about step #2. In order to argue about HOW “it” happened, people are left to IMAGINE what “it” was that happened. From then on, they are only addressing an imaginary problem, not a real problem. And they can never ever solve the real problem unless they begin with step #1, which defines WHAT the problem is they need to solve. See how easy a cover-up works! 😉


    Other examples of Directed Energy (not necessarily used as a weapon) are radio waves, cell phone signals, TV remote control signals, wireless internet signals…etc.

    Those who want to cover up the evidence of what happen often falsely claim that Dr. Wood is talking about a specific weapon and a specific location of it (e.g. laser beam from outer space, or “spacebeams”). This disinformation campaign was initiated by Steven Jones on 11/11/2006 in a presentation he gave in California (available in the internet archives), telling his audience that “Judy Woods (Dr. Wood) says it’s a laser or maser from space” while showing how difficult it is to hold his hand like a beam from space. Not only does Dr. Wood NOT SAY THAT, she actually RULES THAT OUT. The mechanism of destruction of a laser beam would be from heat and produce a bright and blinding light. But we know the buildings were not cooked to death. The term Directed Energy is used because energy is directed to do something different then it normally does and it is directed to do this within a certain geographic zone. [As a mental example, think of directing the binding energy of matter to repel instead of attract. A solid object would turn to atomic-sized dust. Direct this to happen within the WTC complex and not across the street.]

    At the end of Chapter 20 in Dr. Wood’s book, she explains why playing “name the weapon” game is counterproductive. Name dropping trendy terms is not synonymous with understanding. The easiest example is HAARP. The full capabilities are classified. But people often name-drop the trendy term to APPEAR to know something. A tongue-in-cheek definition of HAARP stands for High Amplitude Advancement of Real Propaganda. They are just substituting “HAARP” for “Bin Laden.”

    In Dr. Wood’s book, the closest she comes to “naming a weapon” is merely describing what it creates: magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions (page 365). But as soon as someone starts talking about a name, people will stop looking at the evidence which is another form of a cover up.

    Early on, Steven Jones created a website he called “The Journal of Nine Eleven Studies” or J.O.N.E.S. It is referred to as a “peer-reviewed journal” but the only peer-reviewing was to screen out true scientific work and post what he wanted his followers to believe. For the first two years, it was primarily used to promote disinformation about Dr. Wood’s work. For example, Jones recruited a patent attorney for the oil and gas industry (James Gourley**) to write hit pieces on Dr. Wood, refuting “ray beams from outer space.” This convinced his readers that “Judy Woods” must be talking about “ray beams from outer space” and that “such nonsense has been refuted.” Refuting false propaganda about Dr. Wood’s work does not refute Dr. Wood’s work — yet it creates the belief in the average person that Dr. Wood’s work has been refuted.

    Steven Jones and Greg Jenkins also claimed that it would take more than five times the world’s energy to destroy the WTC towers. Does that mean their thermite came from off planet or “outer space”? LOL Steven Jones used to ridicule Dr. Wood during his talks saying that “Judy Woods needs to make calculations to see if it is even possible to turn the buildings to dust”. But any reputable scientist knows that calculations are not a part of observing empirical evidence. What are the calculations for, to prove the buildings are still there or if the buildings are gone? Why not just look? No assumptions needed with empirical evidence.

    The bottom line is that no one has refuted anything in Dr. Wood’s book nor can they. They only refute their own false propaganda about her book, not her book. Other detractors claim that “she hasn’t identified the weapon that was used so she’s got nothing.” To the contrary. The evidence is PROOF that there exists a technology that can do what was done. It happened. That is, the fact that the buildings mostly turned to dust in mid-air shows that there exists a weapon that can turn buildings into dust in mid-air. It happened.

    The sub-title of the book, “Evidence of Directed Free-Energy Technology on 9/11” indicates that the book contains evidence of what happened on 9/11 and it is indeed evidence that a technology exists that can do what was done. But this technology does not have to be used for evil purposes. It can be used to provide free-energy to the world much to the demise of the oil and gas industry. That is, Dr. Wood is noting that the same technology that was used for evil can also be used for good. It’s a silver lining in the dark cloud… while also trying to stimulate thought about “what are we doing here? learning new ways to kill or to live”?

    “Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.” -Dr. Carl Sagan (1934-1996)

    (Dr. Wood provides extraordinary, overwhelming, and conclusive evidence.)

    by Dr. William L. Baker*

    “The effects can vary in the type of damage mechanism (e.g., blast/fragment, thermal, or ELECTROMAGNETIC PULSE [c-DEW: been there, done that]) as well as the magnitude of the energy deposited on the target so that it will be just enough to defeat the target while minimizing collateral damage.”

    “Scientists will have to overcome technological hurdles, such as the production and storage of antimatter, the ability to propagate sensory information, OR THE ABILITY TO HARNESS AND EXTRACT ENERGY FROM THE ENVIRONMENT [Hurricane Erin 2001: been there, done that], before these sciencefiction concepts will become reality.”

    *Dr. William L. Baker retired on 1/2/10 as the Chief Scientist of the Directed Energy Directorate, Air Force Research Laboratory, Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M. With an annual budget of more than $300 million, the directorate is responsible for all of the Air Force research and development of lasers, high-power microwave and advanced optical technologies. The directorate conducts advanced technology research to support major applications such as airborne lasers, large optical systems for space situational awareness, airborne high-power microwaves, long-range non-lethal weapons and improvised explosive device defeat. The Chief Scientist is the directorate’s primary adviser on scientific and technical matters and the primary authority for the technical content and quality of the science and technology portfolio.

    Dr. Baker was born in Columbus, Ohio. He received his doctorate in nuclear physics from The Ohio State University in 1969 and served four years on active duty in the Air Force as a nuclear research officer. In 1973 he became a civilian scientist at the Air Force Weapons Laboratory where he performed and led high-energy plasma and pulse power research to develop new techniques to simulate nuclear weapon effects. His work in directed energy weapon technology began with high-energy particle beam weapons. Dr. Baker led a joint effort to develop a unique accelerator and used it to demonstrate stable beam propagation in open air. He then created and led the Air Force high-power microwave weapon technology program. As Chief Scientist, he led research and development on high-energy laser weapons technology and the application of advanced optics to space situational awareness. He is a nationally recognized contributor and leader across the entire spectrum of directed energy technologies. He has been president of the Directed Energy Professional Society for the past two years.

    Dr. Baker has written more than 50 publications in nuclear physics, plasma physics, pulsed power and directed energy.

  4. No mention of Dr Judy Wood’s research, except in the comments? Looks like another “garden path” then!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Umai Yomu Anime Blog

Yomu Writes About Anime

Eva Newermann

Art and Books

Dirty Sci-Fi Buddha

Musings and books from a grunty overthinker

100 Word Anime

Reviewing Anime

Logical Quotes

Humbly roaming the universe, usually alone.


Anime/Manga/LN with too much toppings in one bento box.

simple Ula

I want to be rich. Rich in love, rich in health, rich in laughter, rich in adventure and rich in knowledge. You?


VOICE OF GOD (a sci-fi mystery)

%d bloggers like this: